<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MicroIVF, a Better Alternative to Intrauterine Insemination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefertilitydoc.com/microivf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefertilitydoc.com/microivf/</link>
	<description>Insights, Information, and Musings on The World of Fertility, Infertility and Reproductive Medicine By One of The Doctors That Started it All....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:46:33 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kreinerivf</title>
		<link>http://www.thefertilitydoc.com/microivf/comment-page-1/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Kreinerivf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bigbuzz.com/?p=117#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>A full stimulated IVF gives a twice as good success rate as a mini stimulation.  Sometimes as women get older and they have less response to gonadotropins there becomes less of a difference.  In this case it becomes somewhat of a financial decision regarding cost effectiveness of a $3900 attempt vs. the cost of full stim with at most a double the success rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A full stimulated IVF gives a twice as good success rate as a mini stimulation.  Sometimes as women get older and they have less response to gonadotropins there becomes less of a difference.  In this case it becomes somewhat of a financial decision regarding cost effectiveness of a $3900 attempt vs. the cost of full stim with at most a double the success rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopeless68</title>
		<link>http://www.thefertilitydoc.com/microivf/comment-page-1/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>hopeless68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bigbuzz.com/?p=117#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Should a woman 41 years of age try mini IVFs or should she forego the traditional full IVF? We have 2 failed full traditional IVFs and one failed IUI converted to IVF last year.  We recently tried the mini IVF using 5 day Femara oral med, about 200 units of Puregon Pen for the first 5 days of stimulation then was added about 150 units of Repronex during the last 5 days of stimulation.  End result was 6 out 7 eggs were retrieved, two matured after 24 hours but one died so we were left only with 1 3-cell embryo that matured with 3-cell, grade 1 on day two of ISCI and got a negative.  Should we try again and assumed this was a bad cycle or go with the traditional full IVF?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should a woman 41 years of age try mini IVFs or should she forego the traditional full IVF? We have 2 failed full traditional IVFs and one failed IUI converted to IVF last year.  We recently tried the mini IVF using 5 day Femara oral med, about 200 units of Puregon Pen for the first 5 days of stimulation then was added about 150 units of Repronex during the last 5 days of stimulation.  End result was 6 out 7 eggs were retrieved, two matured after 24 hours but one died so we were left only with 1 3-cell embryo that matured with 3-cell, grade 1 on day two of ISCI and got a negative.  Should we try again and assumed this was a bad cycle or go with the traditional full IVF?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gav</title>
		<link>http://www.thefertilitydoc.com/microivf/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>gav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.bigbuzz.com/?p=117#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Then we</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then we</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
